社会学essay高分代写_专业高分assignment代写

发布时间：2020-12-14 热度：

社会学论文代写技巧，社会学高分essay代写，高分assignment代写，专业作业代写社会学
Against Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
Life is just like a one-way ticket, and don’t hurry to end the trip. As a rule, euthanasia means the physician “takes some action to end a patient’s life” while the assisted suicide the patient end his or her life with the means supplied by the physician. (“Bioethics, Euthanasia, and Physician-Assisted Suicide”) People’s opinions are divided for and against assisted suicide and euthanasia. The advocates argue that it is the assisted suicide and euthanasia that is more human, give them the access to die with dignity and prove that the assisted suicide and euthanasia should be permitted. On the other side, the people who are against assisted suicide and euthanasia cannot be regulated properly, and the action can not undo once the was wrong. What’ more important, they make the doctor’s role confused. From the point of my view, I am against the assisted suicide and euthanasia. We should be wary of the ever-changing wills of patients, misunderstanding of autonomy, and the expansion out of control. 
    People’s cognition of assisted suicide and euthanasia change a lot, which makes it likely that the assisted suicide and euthanasia are implemented despite the changed mind of the patients who could not speak. Assisted suicide and euthanasia have commons: Although the means vary, the intention to cause death is present in both cases”(Boudreau and Somerville  2) However, it is the common sense that one person’s will may change accordingly. And Boudreau refers to that the patient is the person who decides whether take the medication provided by the physician, and the patient may change his or her mind at any time. (2) It implies that if the patients who resort to assisted suicide and euthanasia gain access to alternative approaches, they may change their mind. It is acknowledged that once the assisted suicide and euthanasia have been conducted, the result is irreversible which arouses potential ethical issues. Evidence from the palliative care specialists in Swiss, where assisted suicide and euthanasia are legal, illustrate this point as well. They state that the majority of patients will change their mind once the palliative care specialists can reduce their concerns and explain what they can do while only the majority insist on taking assisted suicide as the first choice. (Chantal Britt). It is not hard to find that the wills of patients play the vital part in the self-will death while many factors can have an influence. More importantly, they are not supported by the majority. 
    It is one thing to say that people have autonomy, while it is another thing when it comes to assisted suicide and euthanasia consequently. Most advocates of euthanasia speak highly of the autonomy. However, to respect the autonomy, we must obey the “doctrine of informed consent” in practice and law. When it comes to the assisted suicide and euthanasia, the patients must be informed of the risks, harms, and potential benefits. Moreover, adequate palliative care comes first. However, it is worthy to notice that in euthanasia, the patient must be mentally competent which make the “informed consent” possible. What if the patient can not understand the available options and results? More importantly, the patent might lose the ability to convey his or her understanding and consent to end life. Those who claim the assisted suicide and euthanasia should not take the autonomy for grant and ignore the preconditions at their will. The mentally competent and voluntary consent should be taken into consideration. That is to say, the autonomy doesn’t lead to assisted suicide and euthanasia consequentially.