宗教学essay代写_专业代写essay范文

发布时间：2020-12-30 热度：

mingxinwrite为广大留学生朋友在线上提供essay代写、论文修改润色等相关服务，mingxinwrite不断努力，各个学科的代写专家分布于全球各个地区.我们以留学论文定制写作essay代写为主要服务方向，不管你是寻找英语母语写手还是开展留学申请文书精修、英文论文修改润色、北美论文代写等,我们都会提供最好的服务，不断努力，不断前进，不断提升服务质量，把最优的留学论文解决方案提供给您.

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的essay代写范文 -- Is Margery Kempe heresy?，文章讲述根据异端的第一个定义，那些坚持不懈地反对教会教导而顽固地拒绝服从或收回的人就是异端。根据第二个定义，故意持有与圣经相反的教义并公开宣誓并固执地捍卫它的人是异端。

这两个定义是不同的。众所周知，教会的教义可能与圣经的教义稍有不同，因为教会的教义源自对不同教会的个人解释。因此，一个教会的教导可能与另一个教会的教导稍有不同。

Is Margery Kempe heresy?

According to the first definition of heresy, people who resists to the teaching of the church persistently and obstinately refuses to obey or retract is a heretic. According to the second definition, people who holds intentionally doctrine contrary to holy scripture and avows it publicly and defends it obstinately is a heretic.

These two definitions are different. As we all know, the teaching of the church might be slightly different from the of the holy Scripture, since the teaching of the church derives from the personal interpretations of different churches. Thus, it is possible that teaching of one church might be different from that of another, slightly.

When it comes to the application of the second definition, it is thorny, too. The judgment of to which extent one’s doctrine or opinion is contrary to the holy Scripture is based on personal interpretation of different people. It is possible that while both people think that their opinions are consistent with the holy Scripture, their opinions might be different or contrary to each other. Therefore it lapses into the difficulty of the first definition. However, both definitions share on factor, when considering whether a person is a heretic, the only way is to resort to his or her opinion.

Now, it’s time to examine the two trials in order to figure out whether Kempe should be regarded as a heretic. On the trial of Leicester, the Archbishop ask the reason why Kempe was in white. She kneeled on her knees before him and replies, which means that she obeyed the rule or propriety made by the church—showing respect to the authority. And her reply that she was a wife shows no indignation that she held any opinion contrary to the church. When she was left alone, she made her prayers to our Lord God Almighty to help her, which shows that she has sincere religious Christian experiences. When the “Articles of our Faith” was presented to her, Kempe shows proficiency of the Articles. When she was challenged by the hearsay that she is a “right wicked woman”, she is outspoken to challenge the Archbishop that “so I hear that you are a wicked man”. Though this refutation is impolite, it shows no indignation that she hold doctrine contrary to the teaching of the church. Her refutation is convincing since she shows that ungrounded hearsay is not valid in an argument. When the Archbishop requires her to swear that she shall neither teach nor challenge people at his diocese, she shows great proficiency of her holy Scripture again and replied that she is not preaching. Thus, in the trial, it seems that the Archbishop runs out of any proof to show that she is a heretic.