发布时间：2021-01-24 热度：
代写Essay 就选mingxinwrite代写提供北美代写Essay和Paper代写服务,一键下单,我们的服务有作业代写,代考,网课代修,论文代做,assignment代写,英文写作,澳洲论文代写,...
Federal Labor Tribunals In Mexico
在墨西哥联邦劳动法庭中，使用案例的随机样本，本研究从墨西哥实证角度分析解雇纠纷。特别是,它侧重于在以下三个共同看法终止情况下展示证据:(i)它们通常是由一个裁决决定终止;(ii)他们非常延迟;(3)工人们最终获得的工资极高。统计证据表明,一个特定的子案例中，强调文学和媒体的极端特征(如裁决或上诉过程)产生这些概念。研究总结和简要评论就实证研究的重要性,更好地理解墨西哥的法律现象。
墨西哥的联邦劳工法庭
方法论和数据
结果和讨论
终止支付非常高
终止情况下非常延迟
终止情况下通常去审判
结论
尽管墨西哥的法律分析在过去的几年中，也发生了微妙的变化,英镑的愿景有效地反映了墨西哥主流的“大气的纯法”。墨西哥的劳动法分析?本研究的主题?反映了这种分析路径。事实上,绝大多数有关劳动正义的文献已经富有教义和规范性。这些研究往往忽略事实的证据，即在法律框架下如何影响法律现实;如果提出了一些证据,它只是指示性的或轶事的。这个教义性的研究在公共政策辩论中占举足轻重的地位。
本研究从墨西哥主流完全地离开，基于案例文件分析，作为一个实证研究。研究结果是基于3203个文件的随机样本，选自军政府联邦德Conciliacin Arbitraje(JFCA)存档。
摘要——Abstract
Using a random sample of cases from the Federal Labor Court in Mexico, this research analyzes firing disputes in Mexico from an empirical perspective. In particular, it focuses on presenting evidence in regard to the following three common perceptions on termination cases: (i) that they are often terminated by an adjudicated decision; (ii) that they are extremely delayed; and (iii) that the final payments obtained by the workers are extremely high. The statistical evidence suggests that an emphasis in the literature and media on a particular subsample of cases with extreme characteristics (e.g. adjudicated or appealed processes) produces these conceptions. The study concludes with a brief comment regarding the importance of empirical studies as a way of better understanding legal phenomena in Mexico.
目录——Table of contents
I. Federal labor tribunals in Mexico
II. methodology and Data
III. Results and Discussion
A. 'Termination payments are extremely high'
B. 'Termination cases are extremely delayed'
C. 'Termination cases normally go to trial'
IV. Conclusion
Although the analysis of the law in Mexico has changed slightly in the last years, Pound's vision effectively reflects the 'atmosphere of pure law' of the Mexican mainstream. The analysis of labor law in Mexico?the general topic of this research?reflects this analytical path. In fact, the overwhelming majority of the literature related to labor justice has been doctrinal and normative. These studies often ignore factual evidence of how the legal framework affects the legal reality; and if some evidence is presented, it is merely indicative or anecdotal. This doctrinal research figures prominently in public policy debates.
This study departs completely from the Mexican mainstream insofar as it is an empirical study based on case file analysis. The research results are based on a random sample of 3,203 files selected from the Junta Federal de Conciliaci?n y Arbitraje (JFCA) archive. These files correspond to termination cases presented before the Tribunal 15 of the JFCA (Tribunal 15), a labor tribunal (Junta Especial) whose jurisdiction includes the pharmaceutical, chemical, automotive, and paper industries; and the Tribunal 6 and 8 of the JFCA (Tribunal 6 & 8), the labor tribunals whose jurisdiction includes the textile industry. The period studied extends from
