高分专业essay代写_专业网课代修_高分论文代写

发布时间：2021-07-20 热度：

DueEssay是提供留学生代写，Assignment代写，Exam代考，Report代写，保证100％原创，准时提交高质MLA格式，apa格式，哈佛格式英文论文代写，essay代写价格透明，老牌Essay代写推荐，论文作业代写服务机构。留学生论文网专业提供代写留学作业,代写essay,代写assignment,CS代写，Termpaper代写、Course代写，澳大利亚essay代写，会计学、管理学，社会学、统计学，生物、化学、商业，物理学、生理学、政治学、项目管理学，物业学、心理学等。
专业高分作业代写，高分网课代修，高分作业写作，高分论文代写，高分assignment代写。
A Comparative and Contrastive Analysis of Cultural Globalization
Michel-Rolph Trouillot states that globalization is a historical issue instead of a current phenomenon. As early as five centuries ago, the world started a trend of globalization (Trouillot 8). However, the global trend silences native people in most areas of Asia, Africa and America. Stuart Hall expresses the similar idea that the New World is the beginning of diaspora, of diversity, of hybridity and difference (235). The author admits the existence of globalization in history, but he pays more attention to the heterogenous and divergent aspect of globalization. Because of the invasion of European colonists, Afro-Caribbean people were forced to accept different culture and finally became people far away from their homeland culture.
Different from Trouillot and Hall who believe globalization began long time ago in history, John Tomlinson stresses globalization is the center of modern culture. Tomlinson also declares that globalization is a kind of complex connectivity which could narrow the distance between different places via current electronic communication technology. He expresses that nowadays all the things flow across territorial boundaries (Tomlinson 2). Trouillot admits the transfer of goods in globalization. He reminds his readers of Chinese chili paste from Mexico, French fries from Peru and Jamaican Mountain Blue from Yemen (7). But, at the same time, Trouillot criticizes the phenomenon when people talk about globalization, they always try to silence the past global history, which is just opposite to the opinion held by Tomlinson.

Giles Gunn distinguishes the binary of self and other by explaining people want to maintain their own culture in the way of disparaging and demonizing others’ value. He expresses his concern about the function of the traditional structure of “self” and “other” (Gunn 316). In other words, it is harder and harder to distinguish “self” from “other” in the global background. Hall also discusses the binary of self and other in a different way. Hall stresses the oneness in a shared and collective culture instead of highlighting the significance of otherness (223). He focuses on the unity within all the others.    

Works Cited
Gunn, Giles. “Human Solidarity and the Problem of Otherness.” Religion and Cultural Studies, edited by Susan L. Mizruchi, Princeton University Press, 2001, pp. 316-321.
Hall, Stuart. “Cultural Identity and Diaspora.” Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by J. Rutherford, Lawrence & Wishart, 1990, pp. 222-237.
Tomlinson John. “Globalization as Complex Connectivity.” Globalization and Culture, University of Chicago Press, 1999, pp. 1-31.  
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. “The Perspective of The World.” Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, pp. 3-20.