高分政治学essay代写_专业代写政治学essay

发布时间：2020-12-31 热度：

essay老师布置太多,没时间写essay,怎么办?联系我们吧,我们将为你量身定做essay代写方案,帮你彻底解决essay烦恼,让你拥有更多自由时间!我们承诺essay代写质量都是100%原创,turnitin检测通过,严格遵循老师评分标准和客户要求,essay代写时间约定内交稿,我们的写手至少是master以上级别毕业生,雅思写作25分以上,多年的代写经验为你提供essay代写,assignment代写,Homework代写,paper代写,report代写.

下面为大家整理一篇优秀的essay代写范文 --Hillary Clinton’s Economic Platform in Presidential Campaign，文章讲述虽然每个候选人的经济纲领实际上是由美国的政治历史和他们的政治主张所决定的，但它在选民的决策中仍然起着非常重要的作用。毕竟，经济利益与普通人的联系更加紧密。现在我们来谈谈希拉里·克林顿的经济纲领。

Although each candidates’ economic platform are actually determined by American’s political history and their political proposition,  it still plays a very important role in voters making their decisions. After all, economic benefits are more closely connected with ordinary people. Now we are going to talk about Hillary Clinton’s economic platform.

Individual income taxes are closely bound up with people’s disposable income and living standard and what’s more, it’s a significant tool in adjusting income of people at different income levels. Tax justice forms an integral part of social justice and at the same time a very important tool to achieve social justice relatively. In last presidential campaign in 2008, Clinton claimed that she would not raise the income tax on anyone who makes under $250,000 a year. She is also for taxing the wealthy and giving tax cuts to middle class people. More outspokenly, she raised strong opposed opinion on the carried-interest loophole by stating that it's unreasonable for billionaires such as Warren Buffett to pay a low tax rate and should go back to paying pre-Bush tax rates. But when it comes to capital gains taxes, the investment income tax, she said in a debate that she would only raise it to 20%, which figure is lower than labor income. In theory, a progressive and relatively fair tax system should impose more on investment income that labor income.

As for her position on corporate income taxes, she voted for the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 legislation, namely the so-called 2004 Corporate Tax Giveaway Bill for the purpose of increasing jobs, but it turned out to be a disaster. The significant tax cuts aiming at helping unemployment actually did not lead to any job creation but instead offered companies good opportunities to leave more of their profits overseas to avoid taxes. Although Clinton encourages corporations to assume more social responsibility, we have to admit that corporations are profit-oriented. Therefore, in October last year, she noted that giving tax cuts to corporations does not help grow the economy and this statement indicates Clinton’s advocate to make ensuring that corporations should pay their fair share in taxes.