专业社会学论文代写_高端essay代写网课代修

发布时间：2020-12-13

专业社会学代写_高分essay代写_专业网课代修
MICHAEI WALZERare entitled to a kind of moral respect not due to terrerists, because they set limits o their actions643The Vietcong assassination campaigrThe precise limits are hard to define, as in the case of noncombatant immunity But we can perhaps move toward a definition by looking at a guerrilla war in which officials were attacked on à large scale. Beginning at some point in the late 1950s, the NLE waged a campaign aimed at destroving the governmental struc ture of the South Vietnamese countryside. Between 1960 and 1965, some 7500 village and district officials were assassinated by Vietcong militants. An American tudent of the Vietcong, describing these officials as the "natural leaders" of Vietnamese society, argues that "by any definition this NLF action ... amounts to genocide.w12 This assumes that all Vietnam's natural leaders were government officials (but then, who was leading the NLF) and hence that government officials were literally indispensable to national existence. Since these assumptions are not remotely plausible, it has to be said that "by any definition" the killing of leaders is not the same as the destruction of entire pcoples. Terrorism may foreshadow genocide, but assassination doces not.On the other hand, the NLF campaign did press against the limits of the potion of officialdom as I have been usint it. The Front tended to include among officials anvone who was paid by the government, even if the work he was doing- às a public health officer, for example -had nothing to do with the

particular policies the NLF opposed. And it tended to assimilate into officialdom people like priests and landowners who used their nongovernmental authority in specifi ways on behalf of the government. They did not kill anvone, apparently, ius because he was a priest or a landowner; the assassination campaign was planned with considerable attention to the details of individual action, and a concerted effort was made "to ensure that there were no unexplained killings,"l4 Still. the range of vulnerability was widened in disturbing wavs.One might argue, I suppose, that any official is by definition engaged in the political efforts of the (putatively) unjust regime, just as any soldier, whether he is actually fighting or not, is engaged in the war effort. But the variety of activities sponsored and paid for by the modern state is extraordinary, and it seems intemperate and cxtravagant to make all such activities into occasions for assassination.Assuming that the regime is in fact oppressive, one should look for agents ofDouglas Pike, Viet Cang: The Orgunisation and Technigue of the Nationtal Liberation Front goauth Viegtans (Cambridge, MA MIT Press, 1966), p. 248.3 Jefficy Race, War Cower to Lont An (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972),p. 83, which suggests thar it was precisely the bet public health officers, teachers, and so on who were attacked because they constituted a possible anti-cornmunist leadership.Pike, Viet Cong, p. 250.